Setting
Goals that Work
By Toni Cascio, Ph.D.
In September 1970, Mick Jagger was on the
cover of Rolling Stone. The first Monday Night
Football game saw the Cleveland Browns defeat
the New York Jets. The Mary Tyler Moore Show
premiered on television. And debuting in showrooms
across America was the tinderbox on wheels,
otherwise known as the Ford Pinto. (i)
Do you remember the Pinto? As a car designed
to compete with the sudden influx of Japanese
and German imports, it had all the right specs.
It was small, economical and popular with
American consumers. There was only one hitch:
due to the positioning of the gas tank, it
had a tendency to burst into flames when rear-ended.
(ii)
Among the company's expectations set out
for the Pinto was that it cost less than $2000.
Although Ford knew that a $1 part would solve
the problem with the gas tank, they opted
not to include it because doing so would cause
the company to go over its stated budget goal.
(iii)
This debacle is one of several examples of
how setting goals can be a counterproductive
business measure found in the recent article
from the Harvard Business School, "Goals
Gone Wild: The Systematic Side Effects of
Over-Prescribing Goal Setting."
The premise of this much blogged- and twittered-about
article is that excessive goal setting leads
to many negative business practices, such
as poor decision-making, unethical behavior,
damaging levels of competition among employees
and even decreased motivation. (iv)
This opinion runs counter to conventional
wisdom that says goal setting is a necessary
component of productivity. Studies have shown
that setting goals helps people achieve more,
improves self-confidence and reduces stress.
(v) S.M.A.R.T. goals – which stand for specific,
measurable, attainable, relevant and time-bound
– have been demonstrated to increase motivation
and performance. (vi) As Brian Tracy, guru
of goal setting, says, "Success is goals
and all else is commentary." (vii)
So who's right? The answer is: both camps.
The Harvard study does present some compelling
evidence that unrealistic and poorly formed
goals can do more harm than good. However,
we don't need to throw the baby out with the
bathwater. This study can be a wake-up call
to help us form better, more useful goals.
Here are a few ways to go about this:
1. Be Specific, But Not Rigid
Although the authors of the Harvard study
state that, in certain circumstances, the
admonition to "do your best" is more effective
than setting out specifics, vagueness of goals
is not helpful. You need to make sure that
both parties have shared definitions of what
"doing your best" looks like, realizing that
you may need to negotiate what goes into this
definition.
2. Goal Setting Must Be Individualized
Goals aren't going to be effective unless
they have meaning to the person setting them.
One size does not fit all. Not everyone can
achieve a certain level of sales or performance.
Goals need to take into account people's abilities.
3. Take Organizational Culture and
Ethics into Consideration
From the outset, you should consider the impact
that goals will have on the organizational
culture as well as the ethical implications
of your decisions. If certain goals are going
to cause cutthroat competition or dishonesty
in reporting, they're not good goals. If your
desired product is going to kill off all sea
life in the northern hemisphere, you should
probably rethink it.
4. Be Willing to Revise
Goals set in businesses are not the Gettysburg
Address; they're not priceless literature
such that altering them will be a great loss
to humanity. If your goals are inappropriate
in some way – too high or too low, not addressing
the aspects of employee performance you're
concerned with, too narrowly focused, etc.
– change them. .
Goals should be a guide, a tool that enhances
performance and motivates people to do their
best. If they're not serving this purpose
in your organization, it's time to take a
second look.
References:
(i) http://www.historyorb.com/date/1970/september
(ii) http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1658545_1658498_1657866,00.html
(iii) http://www.motherjones.com/politics/1977/09/pinto-madness
(iv) http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/09-083.pdf
(v) http://www.unhcc.unh.edu/resources/goal-setting.html
(vi) http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newHTE_87.htm
(vii) Tracy, B. (2003). Goals! San Francisco:
Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
Copyright © Bon Mot Communications LLC
2009

Permission to Reprint
Want to use an article from The Corporate
Communicator in your e-zine, website
or other publication? You can, as long as
you include the following:
"Reprinted from The Corporate Communicator,
a FREE e-zine dedicated to helping professional
communicators and business owners communicate
more effectively with employees, customers
and the media. For access to the best communications
tools, tips, research and best practices,
subscribe now at www.thecorporatecommunicator.net."

Want to read more articles
like this? Sign
up for The Corporate Communicator,
a FREE e-zine that helps corporate
communicators do more with less. To
receive our FREE SPECIAL REPORT on building
organizational trust, plus FREE how-to
articles and updates on the latest communications-related
news, research and best practices, sign
up below:
|
|